Accreditation Institutional Self Assessment and Statement of Facts Forms

 

 

This self-assessment component gives clear guidance to senior management and other professionals on what a good institution should look like. It provides useful prompts for assessing each of the Quality Indicators. It is one of a set of documents that form NCCE�s accreditation �Toolkit�. It should be read and used in the context of those other documents. In particular, the document �QUALITY INDICATORS� provides an over-view of the assessment process.

 

A standardized format of self-assessment will provide clear and concise guidance as a starting point for the accreditation process. It will also help to encourage consistency in internal quality assurance. It is necessary to continually revise this self-assessment document as it is will be submitted prior to the accreditation visit.

SECTION 2

EVALUATION PROCESS

 

LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION

 

An institution worthy of accreditation will be able to show evidence that:

A.1 It is acting in accordance with enabling law (it is compulsory to gain at least satisfactory in this area in order to achieve accreditation)

Is a copy available and who is the custodian of the law?

Are all activities in line with the enabling law?     

Quality indicators

Evidence and justification of self-assessment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A.2 It has effective leadership & management (it is compulsory to gain at least satisfactory in this area in order to achieve accreditation)

Is the organogram clearly defined and how does it enable effective management?

How effective are SMT (Senior Management Team) meetings & minutes, reports of SMT to council?

Give examples of how resolutions are implemented?

Give examples of how staff & student opinions are considered and acted upon?

What is the ratio of male / female in leadership posts?

Examples of gender sensitivity being addressed.

What criteria are applied to appointments and committee membership?

 Give evidence of regular, transparent performance appraisal that improves staff.

How often are job descriptions reviewed and how relevant are they?

 How well does the composition of management reflect the needs of the institution community?

How appropriate are the qualifications & experience of management? 

 How effective and transparent are disciplinary mechanisms?

Give examples of how committee outcomes are binding, fair and effective.

State whether the institution community have confidence in the disciplinary committee and how you know?

 

 

Quality indicators

Evidence and justification of self-assessment

 

A.2 (i)

there is a transparent style of leadership and management

 

   

 

 

 

Quality indicators

Evidence and justification of self-assessment

 

A.2 (ii) There is effective staff participation in decision making machinery of the institution

 

  

 

 

 

(iii) There is effective student participation in decision making machinery of the institution

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iv) There are clear and appropriate job descriptions for staff

 

 

 

 

 

 

(v) There is an effective system for performance appraisal of staff

 

 

 

 

Page Under Construction

 


Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to [info@ncceonline.edu.ng].
Copyright � 2016 [NCCE]. All rights reserved.
Last modified: 05/26/16.